August 12, 2012
John 6:35-51
I find much comfort in this week's
passage by John. It is not so much John's attempt at explaining the
mystery of communion, or the resurrection, both extremely important
topics, but it is in the disagreement in interpretation. Jesus is
speaking to the people, and people are misinterpreting him. Right
there, even at the time. It may sound small, petty and selfish, but
it gives me a whole lot of hope. God did not give up on us, Jesus
did not give up on the people he was preaching too, and although as
the many denominations point out, no one agrees completely on
communion theology, we are promised in verse 37 that, “Everything
that the Father gives me will come to me and anyone who comes to me I
will never drive away.” He goes on in verse 39 to remind us that I
should lose nothing at all that he has given me, but raise it up on
the last day.”
John reminds us that Jesus was
sometimes difficult to understand. Jesus made many references that
the people would understand but he also used a great deal of metaphor
and simile. As any middle school English student can tell you these,
literary devices are not always easy to understand. For many years,
the Romans believed that Christians were cannibals, citing Jesus
telling us to eat his flesh. This is just one example of the
misinterpretations that can and have occurred throughout the ages.
Then in verse 41 we hear the complaints
begin. How can this man claim to have come down from heaven? He is
merely human! We know his parents! This is ridiculous.
Jesus refutes them and uses references
to Isaiah and Moses to make his point. God draws us to Jesus. We
can't do it on our own. We can't just decide to be drawn to Jesus,
but rather God draws us to Jesus and all of us who are pulled towards
Jesus will have eternal life.
Jesus used the analogy of the bread of
life to refer to himself. That is very interesting. At this time
period at leas 50% or more of a persons calories were consumed
through bread daily. But anyone who has every made bread can tell
you this is not a quick process, even today. If you lived at Jesus'
time you had to grow the wheat, harvest it, mill it, and then store
it without vermin getting into it. Then you have to add the yeast,
sugar and water, mix in the flour and let rise, then you needed to
knead it, and let rise again. Finally you bake it. This is a
lengthy time consuming process. I wonder if following Jesus is not
the same. It fills us, gives us everything we need, but is a lengthy,
time consuming process.
When Jesus discusses consuming himself
he may have also been referencing a traditional practice of writing
verses from a Torah and consuming them in order to pull them inside
one's self and fully live them daily. By the time Jesus was
preaching, it was understood that you did not have to actually eat
them, but you had to be with them, be fed by them and spend time with
them in order to live them out, just as one has to spend time in food
preparation in order to consume it and use it to help sustain their
body. We need to spend time with Jesus to sustain our souls.
So why did Jesus choose to be the bread
of life? What does it mean that it takes so long to make bread? How
are we pulled by God? How are we nourished? What does it mean that
every one of us that feels called by God will not be lost? Why all
the metaphors? What did Jesus mean then and for us now?
No comments:
Post a Comment